I think that progress has been made under McGeeney, which at times has been slow, frustrating and littered with mistakes, but overall I think we are in a better position than we were when he took over. We have a strong panel of players, with some quality individuals all over the field, but are lacking in certain areas that makes all the difference and which is difficult for management to rectify. McGeeney's record in Ulster hasn't been good. Some of the losses were expected, others not. We have yo-yo-ed between Division 2 and 3 in his time, but now look like we have established ourselves in Division 2 and next year should be looking to push for promotion. Our inability to see out games that we have been winning easily has been a feature of McGeeney's time in charge and can be put down to a young team learning. But there's only so long you can make that excuse for. At what point does a young team, become an experienced side, who should be acting on their experiences from previous seasons and finishing out games we are leading in? This failure in the team struck us again this season in both league and championship and I don't know how it will be rectified. If McGeeney stays on this is one of the major areas of our team that needs addressed. If it's not, this team will just sputter along, claiming the odd win here and there, but nothing that you can rely on.
I think the question should also be asked about what this team can realistically do in Ulster and beyond and how this shapes people's opinion on McGeeney? We are some way off Tyrone and especially Donegal at the moment. Cavan are slightly ahead of us too (but we should have beaten them on both occasions) and it looks like we have now moved ahead of Monaghan. Depending on what draw we get at the moment, will determine if we can get to an Ulster final. It's an obvious point I know, but if we were to get Donegal away next season in our first match, you'd have to say that we'd be massive underdogs. Would that then reflect badly on McGeeney if we lost it? Similarly we could Antrim at home, with the semi-final against Fermanagh or Derry and then we'd have a great chance of getting to the Ulster final. Would that then reflect well on McGeeney? On our day we can give most teams in Ulster a game, but would we win an Ulster title? Not yet.
On a national scale, it's hard to say where we rank but again the draw can make a massive difference. Cork got relegated to Division 3, they pulled themselves together, stuffed Limerick, gave Kerry a good game, then got two relatively soft draws in the qualifiers and now find themselves in the Super 8. We got the toughest draw you could get and lost by a point. Again, the game was there for the taking and had we that little bit more know how, we would have won. The point is, there's a lot that McGeeney can do and there's other stuff which he has zero control over and the luck of the draw went against us, to have to play Mayo. It went for Cork and they are now in the Super 8's (which is probably where they should be with their resources and playing numbers).
Key injuries and players dropping in and out of the panel at various times and for various reasons hasn't helped things either. We've struggled to get a settled team out consistently and when we have, it hasn't always been great, but we've seen what we can do in flashes. We've seen knew players introduced to the team and other players that have been persisted with that are now showing their worth. It's for this reason, more than others, that I feel that McGeeney should be kept on for another 2 years. He's got a team together (who by all accounts mostly get on with him) and for him to go now and a new man comes in with a new style of play, it's very hard for us to start from scratch again and keep moving forward. Changes to his background team could well make a difference and could play a crucial role in this team really pushing into the top band of teams.