Peter grimes
Well-Known Member
This has taken an odd turn.
Pablo - still plenty of room for your views here.
Jim - I used an analogy and maybe I have made the same mistake as I think you are making. I think your speeding analogy is dangerous. It’s not the same as my crash landing scenario. My scenario shows that one person can’t do their own thing when others don’t want to take the same risk. Your speeding analogy includes the line “if I choose to drive at 200 mph then I deal with the consequences”. My concern is (whether intentionally or not) that reads as we each decide our own level of risk appetite. With Covid it isn’t feasible to let people decide their own risk appetite. I’d go further and say it isn’t possible for people to assess what the risk actually is.
And for speeding we have rules. The rules are not just speed limits. You can be prosecuted because of your speed whilst driving well within the speed limit. People need to be sensible. The less we can rely on people being sensible the more specific the rules need to be
Pablo - still plenty of room for your views here.
Jim - I used an analogy and maybe I have made the same mistake as I think you are making. I think your speeding analogy is dangerous. It’s not the same as my crash landing scenario. My scenario shows that one person can’t do their own thing when others don’t want to take the same risk. Your speeding analogy includes the line “if I choose to drive at 200 mph then I deal with the consequences”. My concern is (whether intentionally or not) that reads as we each decide our own level of risk appetite. With Covid it isn’t feasible to let people decide their own risk appetite. I’d go further and say it isn’t possible for people to assess what the risk actually is.
And for speeding we have rules. The rules are not just speed limits. You can be prosecuted because of your speed whilst driving well within the speed limit. People need to be sensible. The less we can rely on people being sensible the more specific the rules need to be