So, the missus allowed me to read Monday’s paper.
I suppose if you were looking for something to pick at, you’d find it. But there were complimentary statements too.
The 28-12 fouls thing could be interpreted as a pinickity ref rather than Armagh’s physicality. Another ref might let it go, and allow a more physical game from one/both teams. You can be physical without being dirty.
Can’t comment on Mackin, but Sheridan was fortunate to stay on. You can’t argue with that.
“We always go to the end”, “could never quite shake us off”, and complimenting scores especially Grimley sideline.
From what I heard and seen, the rest I can’t really argue with. A bad night, some poor decisions etc.
I suppose “crude and untidy” tackling, you can take from that what you will. But one mans “robust challenge” is another mans “ya dirty fecker!!”.
Donegal were probably as physical but the odd bit of quality that happened to win the match might have covered up their ills. And as the losers, we were lumped with the untidy/physical label. An odd score here, and roles are reversed.
So, to sum up - it wasn’t that bad, Ted.
But since this bias has been pointed out, I’ll keep an eye on future reviews.
Anyway, I’m away to lock myself in the coalshed. Nobody tell
@Calm1 where I’m at.